To say that StinkyLulu has a love/loathe relationship with David Lynch would be simplifying things. Twenty years ago, Lynch's Blue Velvet and Fassbinder's Querelle were the first films I truly thought/fought about as passionately about as I did literature or theatre. Moreover, and more than most contemporary directors, I've always really "connected" with Lynch's reverence for actors -- as mysterious, possibly mystical beings -- as well as his fascination with (extra)ordinary faces, voices and bodies. But if Blue Velvet was Lulu's first experience with Lynchian love, Wild at Heart was certainly its complement: my first experience truly loathing Lynch. Rescreening the film now, for the first time in nearly two decades, I'm struck that Wild at Heart remains Lynch's least interesting film, the project most snared in the auteur's transition from Hollywood trope as metaphor (Blue Velvet, Twin Peaks) to Hollywood trope as conceptual device (Mulholland Dr., Inland Empire). But I must admit that this film also contains some of the best actoring at the edges Lu's ever seen (Harry Dean Stanton & Willem Dafoe), as well as the incomparable extraordinariness of...approximately 19 minutes and 38 seconds
28 scenes
roughly 16% of film's total running time
28 scenes
roughly 16% of film's total running time
Diane Ladd plays Marietta Fortune (aka "Lula's Momma"), a woman murderously obsessed with keeping her beloved daughter (Laura Dern in a brazen, mature performance) from the adoring clutches of the shady-but-sexy Sailor (Nicholas Cage, effective but a little lost here).
The result is a garish, discomfiting performance -- unpleasant, freakish and confusing.
Ladd's performance is also just brilliant. In Marietta, Ladd inhabits a stock character of Southern womanhood -- equal parts Scarlett O'Hara and Tennessee Williams and Dallas -- a type likely immediately recognized/dismissed by late 20th century U.S. audiences. Instead of pitching all that silly Southern schtick as "real" (whether through crafty nuance or maudlin sincerity), Ladd opts to unfetter Marietta as a primal, elemental, animal force.

According to one of my Oscar books, Ladd actually invited over 20 members of the Academy to her house for dinner and a movie right before voting. The movie just happened to be Wild at Heart.
ReplyDeleteStill, though, I agree that this is one of the most shocking nominations; even though Oscar tends to get a little autre when it comes to weaker years, Ladd's nod is amazing considering its bizarre caliber, particularly since someone like Shirley MacLaine had a much more Oscar-friendly perf.
I agree with you that it is quite shocking that Ladd nabbed an Oscar nomination (based on how Oscar noms tend to go), but I think this role is perhaps one of the most daring and deserving (dare I say it) ever. To watch her sail over the top yet hold onto the reins is fantastic and breathtaking to watch, and a testament to her wizardry of acting. That, and every time the camera catches the reveal of her lipsticked face, it still scares the crap out of me.
ReplyDeleteGreat analytical lapse into things Freudian.
ReplyDeleteAs for Ladd's performance - I applaud anybody who tries to re-create, re-inhabit, re-imagine tired old stereotypes. Always worth the risk.
Actually my virgin exposure to Diane Ladd. Is she more enjoyable older or younger?
ReplyDeleteI was delighted by her cameo in INLAND EMPIRE.
YAY!
ReplyDelete