tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post114400099060884639..comments2023-12-06T09:39:43.731-05:00Comments on StinkyLulu: Cast Your Vote for MAY's "Supporting Actress Sunday" SeriesStinkyLuluhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11765533714740641857noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-69089667596707059772009-12-15T23:55:29.779-05:002009-12-15T23:55:29.779-05:00I love your review. I have a fascination with Suns...I love your review. I have a fascination with Sunset Boulevard that borders on an obsession. You've hit it right on the head with your assessment of Nancy Olson's role. <br />Norma and Betty are twin succubi! That is one of the gazillion layers that make this film a masterpiece.Barbara Ruth Saundershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01799097040002221934noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-1145847869829159092006-04-23T23:04:00.000-04:002006-04-23T23:04:00.000-04:00This is wonderful, Lulu. I vote 1941.This is wonderful, Lulu. I vote 1941.goatdoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09641012995798477279noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-1145276578031446162006-04-17T08:22:00.000-04:002006-04-17T08:22:00.000-04:00I want in on this! Fab project Lulu. 1968 looks li...I want in on this! Fab project Lulu. 1968 looks like the most interesting to me, partly as I've always wanted to see <I>The Heart is a Lonely Hunter</I> and <I>Faces</I>. I've seen <I>Now Voyager</I> and <I>Ambersons</I> really recently, so 1942 would mean only watching two new films, but that's fine too.tim rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11893294970751318226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-1145221502491057362006-04-16T17:05:00.000-04:002006-04-16T17:05:00.000-04:001995 is the year I'm more curious about after seei...1995 is the year I'm more curious about after seeing Mira Sorvino's very decent performance in Mighty Aphrodite. But I think I'd prefer 1950 as I've already seen two nominees and I'm longing for Sunset Boulevard. <BR/><BR/>I vote 1950.Calum Reedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05410595002533524268noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-1145123552739851222006-04-15T13:52:00.000-04:002006-04-15T13:52:00.000-04:0019681968par3182https://www.blogger.com/profile/03647653154201086767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-1144980823138690212006-04-13T22:13:00.000-04:002006-04-13T22:13:00.000-04:00i say 1941 because i need a reason to watch Mrs Mi...i say 1941 because i need a reason to watch Mrs Miniver (finally)NATHANIEL Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11597109147678235399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-1144898301730453072006-04-12T23:18:00.000-04:002006-04-12T23:18:00.000-04:00As a potential respondent, I don't really feel lik...As a potential respondent, I don't really feel like '59 right now (no pressing desire to revisit <I>Room at the Top</I> or <I>Pillow Talk</I>, but any of the others are fine. 1942 will have the most new material for me, but that's neither here nor there, and I really like a lot of the other years you've mentioned.NicksFlickPickshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04607501848596529493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-1144868693082483042006-04-12T15:04:00.000-04:002006-04-12T15:04:00.000-04:00--you could do '95 without reviewing the movies.--...--you could do '95 without reviewing the movies.<BR/><BR/>-- 1977--not my vote. I happen to know Looking for Mr. Goodbar is not out on DVD, so that might be challenging. And Quinn Cummings is the little girl, right?<BR/><BR/>-- 1968--you get to watch Funny Girl, Rachel, Rachel, and Rosemary's Baby--how jealous am I? <BR/>but...<BR/><BR/>1959 is Imitation of Life, which almost takes it by itselfCriticlasmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15942568777607340234noreply@blogger.com