tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post1134288606322511907..comments2023-12-06T09:39:43.731-05:00Comments on StinkyLulu: VOTE: SEPTEMBER's Supporting Actress Sundays!StinkyLuluhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11765533714740641857noreply@blogger.comBlogger24125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-35307090499685286222009-08-30T07:45:43.732-04:002009-08-30T07:45:43.732-04:00cinemadventurer, I doubt all the contemporary year...<i>cinemadventurer</i>, I doubt all the contemporary years will be used. you must be new around here :) only 90, 92, 96 & 99 have been discussed out of the 90s. which left 6 options for that decade.<br /><br />from the 1930s, there are only 2 years (37 & 38) that have not been discussed.<br /><br />I don't see how Night Must Fall is proper fits Halloween, at least not compared to The Alex Constantinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09940311552608814201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-84405795182261279952009-08-29T01:23:18.983-04:002009-08-29T01:23:18.983-04:00I think we should do an older year, like 1937 for ...I think we should do an older year, like 1937 for October. It fits the Halloween theme with Night Must Fall. I LOVE this project and I worry that we will use up all of the intriguing contemporary years (1993 for example) and be left with obscure 1930s and 1940s titles. <br />...Though that would be a fascinating finale - come to think of it. <br /><br />Like I said. LOVE this project! :Dcinema adventureshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01883722567234964198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-17237844102206243922009-08-25T23:17:19.304-04:002009-08-25T23:17:19.304-04:00I voted 1993. I love that so many performances fro...I voted 1993. I love that so many performances from past decades have been reviewed, but I enjoy seeing smackdowns on the more contemporary performances as well.Ready For My Close-Uphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10097422235413406386noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-83684185006108076352009-08-25T19:00:47.582-04:002009-08-25T19:00:47.582-04:00I like the idea of doing an older year and 1952 se...I like the idea of doing an older year and 1952 seems to be the one with the best shot. It's certainly worthy of discussion.<br /><br />Gloria Grahame is a legendary actress, but her Oscar win here is rather controversial and undeserved. Hers is a case of a great year career-wise, but with Oscar choosing the wrong performance/movie. <br /><br />Jean Hagen probably has the smackdown win cinema adventureshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01883722567234964198noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-46464158621830888872009-08-25T10:50:00.293-04:002009-08-25T10:50:00.293-04:00well - if the voting continues to feel hinky, i...well - if the voting continues to feel hinky, i'll pull the plug and make an executive decision (or find another poll site).StinkyLuluhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11765533714740641857noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-33940513994329790882009-08-25T10:43:06.735-04:002009-08-25T10:43:06.735-04:00pardon me, but is someone screwing around with the...pardon me, but is someone screwing around with the votes? Are there voting campaigns going around on other sites? 1993 went from 15% to 31% in just a couple of hours...<br /><br />I'm fine with 93, but still... :)Alex Constantinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09940311552608814201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-22510631499632710822009-08-24T22:07:16.345-04:002009-08-24T22:07:16.345-04:00I too would prefer 1938. But all the year's r...I too would prefer 1938. But all the year's represented have several performances I want to have analyzed.<br />Glad your Back Sinkylu. I hope all is well ! I really look<br />forward to this post.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-5415873845473599252009-08-24T21:14:33.350-04:002009-08-24T21:14:33.350-04:00Sorry. Take that back. I need to see Tuesday Weld ...Sorry. Take that back. I need to see Tuesday Weld get some love, so 1977! :-DUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06015786019236907655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-54558567288937960002009-08-24T21:13:37.902-04:002009-08-24T21:13:37.902-04:001981!! :-D1981!! :-DUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06015786019236907655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-22098111686598333632009-08-24T18:49:38.955-04:002009-08-24T18:49:38.955-04:00Come on, fans of 1965! Speak up! I can't be th...Come on, fans of 1965! Speak up! I can't be the only one with a need for all things Maggie Smith!Walter L. Hollmannhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13636732594078157905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-48402432971220060172009-08-24T18:43:16.011-04:002009-08-24T18:43:16.011-04:00it's still too close to call. and I see the vo...it's still too close to call. and I see the voting ends on Saturday. :D so who knows.<br /><br />77 might also get the support of those who wanted 81, but realized it doesn't stand a change :)Alex Constantinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09940311552608814201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-3123018433807218382009-08-24T18:23:13.379-04:002009-08-24T18:23:13.379-04:00I'm shocked to see 1977s strong showing. Just...I'm shocked to see 1977s strong showing. Just as I was getting revved for THE BAD AND THE BEAUTIFUL, I need to shift gears to JULIA...StinkyLuluhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11765533714740641857noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-22526383256243066092009-08-24T14:20:37.941-04:002009-08-24T14:20:37.941-04:001977 has some die hard fans, as it's close to ...1977 has some die hard fans, as it's close to getting #1 and 52 #2.<br /><br />they are either gays who love ballet, lesbians (or communists) who love Lillian Hellman or science fiction fanatics hungry for some close encounters. :) we'll see.Alex Constantinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09940311552608814201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-77593249709536479362009-08-24T13:38:55.273-04:002009-08-24T13:38:55.273-04:0081 would be fabulous--I saw REDS at the 25th anniv...81 would be fabulous--I saw REDS at the 25th anniversary rerelease and Maureen Stapleton is wonderful.<br /><br />But 52! Jean Hagen in Singing in the Rain? Comedy classic (and Theo fave ;)). Hard for me to hear that someone thinks it's a hack job, but to each his own (not that I have an opinion already, or anything). And Come Back, Little Sheba in the same year, and a little Thelma. Love Criticlasmhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15942568777607340234noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-74603735599141945672009-08-24T12:04:35.140-04:002009-08-24T12:04:35.140-04:00I really want to see 1977. It's an unfairly m...I really want to see 1977. It's an unfairly maligned lineup. Redgrave was the best thing about Julia and Weld and Dillon were excellent. <br /><br />But I'd love to see 1981 as well.Michael Shetinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04111501657467094312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-12960833144417577142009-08-24T11:52:40.970-04:002009-08-24T11:52:40.970-04:00I voted for 1938, just because I'd like to see...I voted for 1938, just because I'd like to see a lineup profiled from that decade again. But 1952 is another interesting one.Seanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11900526404167370380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-63172743906711963562009-08-24T11:37:25.904-04:002009-08-24T11:37:25.904-04:00I vote for 1981 !!!!
Maureen Stapleton all the wa...I vote for 1981 !!!!<br /><br />Maureen Stapleton all the way!Billy Held An Oscarhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09462888920400921139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-59277717208172531912009-08-24T08:20:03.615-04:002009-08-24T08:20:03.615-04:00I chose 38, although 52 will win easily, thanks to...I chose 38, although 52 will win easily, thanks to the strangely positive consensus on that horrendous hack job that is Hagen's performance in 'Singin' in the Rain'.Slaytonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03788927670985682471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-10376393525832948182009-08-23T22:16:52.986-04:002009-08-23T22:16:52.986-04:001952 - Hagen in her best-ever screen role1952 - Hagen in her best-ever screen roledrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02196552603639190817noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-6361518087071351522009-08-23T21:22:55.753-04:002009-08-23T21:22:55.753-04:001952 - so jean hagen can get her long overdue win1952 - so jean hagen can get her long overdue winpar3182https://www.blogger.com/profile/03647653154201086767noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-6132952571443337472009-08-23T18:05:31.194-04:002009-08-23T18:05:31.194-04:00Sorry Alex, I can't resist. 1981 all the way. ...Sorry Alex, I can't resist. 1981 all the way. Although I would love to hear what people think about 1993. Never saw <i>Moulin Rouge!</i> and will have to search very hard to find that here.Andrew K.https://www.blogger.com/profile/01104647944747041277noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-37259597349855203882009-08-23T17:59:51.639-04:002009-08-23T17:59:51.639-04:00I voted 1952 (regular voters might remember it'...I voted 1952 (regular voters might remember it's been consider for many previous rounds and it never made it), even though 1981 looks very tempting. who knows :DAlex Constantinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09940311552608814201noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-21039241010850346392009-08-23T17:44:34.085-04:002009-08-23T17:44:34.085-04:00SPB is me, by the way, Scott Poulson-Bryant! xSPB is me, by the way, Scott Poulson-Bryant! xSPBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10869029528747857485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8640084.post-17024240091903897232009-08-23T17:43:57.396-04:002009-08-23T17:43:57.396-04:0052 and 77 are probably my faves from the choices.....52 and 77 are probably my faves from the choices...i LOVE that you do this!!!! such a pleasure to read, man!SPBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10869029528747857485noreply@blogger.com